You'd have to mkdir c:\nw\blahcomp then mklink /d c:\nw\blahcomp\crp \\192.168.0.30\carp (when you give mklink the first argument / the first actual parameter, if it's just one level then it isn't funny, but if it's multi-level e.g. You could make a c:\nw directory to make clearer that a thing in there is on the network, and you could get the link to be to c:\nw\blahcomp\carp for shared directory \\192.168.0.30\carp. The system cannot find the path specified. mklink will happily create whatever link, just not whatever drive. One weakness of mklink compared to net use, is that with mklink you can't specify a new drive letter. Symbolic link created for c:\asdfbba > \\192.168.0.30\carp By the way likewise net use can be used for local directories too, just net use has the issue, as does subst(subst of course can't link to network drives).Ĭreating a symbolic link to mapped network drive in Windows C:\Windows\system32>mklink /d c:\asdfbba \\192.168.0.30\carp You can use mklink, (some don't realise that mklink can be used for network "shares"). Mklink doesn't have the problem that you are running into, that net use and subst have, which is that administrative cmd prompts and non-administrative cmd prompts can't see the results of each others net use or subst mappings. From this point forward, all devices are associated with an authentication ID (LUID) - an ID generated for each logon session.īecause these mapped drives are associated with LUID, and because elevated applications are using a different LUID generated during a separate login event, the elevated application will no longer see any mapped drives for this user.Ī far from ideal solution, is mklink, as it's not creating a new drive, but it is creating a directory on your local drive, that links to a network drive. For security reasons, we modified this behavior beginning with Windows 2000 SP2. Prior to Windows 2000 SP2, device names remained globally visible until explicitly removed or the system restarted. This convenience feature makes it easier to run into issues with mapped network drives. We then detect that you have UAC enabled, we log in a second time, and end up with a new (highly restricted) token, which we use to launch the shell. To simplify things, let's assume you are running as an administrator with UAC enabled (although, to be more secure, it is better to run as a standard user). Mapped Network Drives with UAC on Windows VistaĮdit: relevant bits from the blog entry (emphasis mine): The reason for having to recreate the shares is explained on this MSDN blog entry: a Windows Explorer launched with "Run as administrator") and recreate all network shares, that should do the trick. Try launching an elevated Windows Explorer (i.e. Since almost all users used an administrator account in XP (as most programmers didn't bother to make their programs work with limited accounts), Microsoft made a "limited version" of administrator accounts starting with Vista, an in some situations the two "versions" counts as different users (since they are separate sessions). Note that an user can have more that one session. different users may have a different set of network shares). Network shares being associated with sessions (i.e.Probably that is not a problem of file permissions but it's related with:
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |